Tag Archives: Deconstructivism

Phenomena, Mount and Remounted

Michelle Stone Grue-some Heads, Creatures and Shadows @ Ceres Gallery 547 West 27th Street (between 10th and 11th Avenues), Suite 201, New York, NY 10001. The exhibition is on view in Gallery I from April 24 until May 19, 2012.

Stone, Grue-some, 8 by 10 inches, acrylic and modeling paste. Image courtesy of Ceres Gallery.

In his 2003 essay “Renaissance Ideas about Self-Portrayal,” Norman E. Land noted that the Renaissance art critic had a penchant for the divine connection between artist and her work. By inventing a construction out of mere paint or stone, an artist creates something that, before, has never existed. The Renaissance ideology held that the artist would leave an imprint of herself on the surface, just as God had created man in the image of himself. Land referenced Petrarch’s notion that “art mirrors the artist’s psyche, his imagination, soul, mind, or genius.”

Our contemporary view often alludes to similar sentiments sans religious persuasions: we explain our obsessions with artist’s imprint as emotive evidence of artist’s presence. Perhaps we secretly wish to either place the artist on a godly pedestal or to perversely remind ourselves that the artist is as human as we. Whichever our reason we enjoy a line awry.

Michelle Stone satisfies our desires with sculptural installation depicting human condition and cycle of erosion. Stone works in acrylic, molding paste, plaster and other media to produce highly-textured organic relief and sculpture. Some works appear to have sprouted naturally off the wall, while others resemble hand-molded contorted figures. Brazen depth casts shadows onto the wall and conflates with pitted contours extending into gallery space. Grue-some Heads, Creatures and Shadows presents a fictitious scene comprised of empty cocoons, and, in turn, the installation confronts the dichotomy of naivety and maturity.

Michelle Stone taught painting and drawing at The School of the Art Institute of Chicago for twenty-five years. A former art therapist, now she facilitates art appreciation sessions and teaches with Art Encounter, a non-profit art and education organization.

Email This Post Email This Post
Posted in Recommendations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Painter’s Palette: Interview with Jacob Ouillette

Interview with Jacob Ouillette who showed at Nancy Margolis Gallery from October 20th until November 26th, 2011 at 523 West 25th Street, New York, NY

Ouillette, Calliope, 2011, oil/canvas, 48"x60"

Megan M. Garwood (MMG):  What is a brushstroke to you?

Jacob Ouillette (JO): To me, it is many things.  In the first place, the brushstroke is the embodiment of an idea or feeling.  It is a voice.  The Brushstroke is also a note in a musical composition, preferably played on the harmonica.  I’ve been playing the harmonica longer than I’ve been painting, almost my whole life, and those sounds, rhythms and feelings are imprinted in me.  When the brushstroke bends, swoops, dips, swings, sings and vibrates, to me it could be blasting out of a harmonica, saxophone, or an electric guitar.  Each brushstroke is applied in one single motion, one pass, from left to right with no revisions allowed, or necessary, like the mark of a calligraphers brush.  The paintings are created almost as a live performance, one stroke, or note at a time, until the composition is complete, the song ends when the last note is played.  Unlike live music though, the painting holds that “live” moment frozen indefinitely.

Ouillette, Pico Blanco, 2010, oil/canvas, 45"x90"

MMG:  What kind of media do you prefer, i.e., paint? Do you mix your own color?

JO: Over the centuries there has been a debate about whether a painter is a craftsman or a poet.  I have come to believe, through my practice, that I must be both.  I realized that commercially prepared paints and canvases, could not give me the results I sought, therefore I began preparing my own materials from scratch, as the old masters did.  I prefer oil paint because the color is more saturated, you can pack a lot more pigment into the paint and I want to start off with colors that are as rich and as saturated as they can be.  I want to make paintings that have power and powerful colors are part of this.  My studio is almost like a workshop.  Today, a helper in the studio is called an assistant, but I call my helpers, apprentices, because that is what they are, and I do my best to pass on my knowledge about the craft of painting.  So far, I’ve avoided getting an MFA, and purposely so. I did a BFA at RISD and that was great, but I guess I would rather start my own school than join the academy.

Ouillette, Easter Painting, 2008, oil/canvas, 60"x72"

MMG:  There is an obvious reference to the grid as well as infamous color palettes. How do you choose your palette? How would you define your work as an “Ouillette?

JO: Considering the musical quality of my work, there is also a mathematical component and that translates as the grid.  I am interested in the proportions of colors used, how many times do they appear in the composition, are all the colors equal, or not? The grid is the meter of the work, keeping the rhythm and the strokes in line and carefully measuring each color in the composition.

I am not one of those painters that use a specific palette, nor do I ascribe to any color theories.  I try to use color differently in each painting and look to every experience for inspiration.  In the past, I’ve tried reading some books on color theory, but I always gave up halfway through.  My personal theory accepts and disregards all theories.  To me, any color, or combination of colors is as good as another, if you believe in it.

If you go through the titles of my paintings, you will notice three reoccurring themes, mythology, music and place (the landscape). Ellsworth Kelly is one of my favorite minimalist painters.  His paintings, as self referential as they seem, always have a source – often forms taken from nature.  Similarly, my paintings are self- contained but always have a source.  Music is a big inspiration and some paintings are titled and inspired by songs I enjoy or am moved by.  For example, I made a painting called Bold as Love, inspired by the Jimi Hendrix song, Axis: Bold as Love.  In the song, he describes certain colors as a way to explain his feelings to a lover.  I was sympathetic to this and felt moved to make a painting using colors similar to the ones Hendrix describes.  I also see a kinship with Hendrix, like him, my work is deeply rooted in a tradition, while at the same time, innovation, and personal expression remains at the forefront.

Whenever my eyes are open, I am studying the colors of the world, which provide an endless parade of inspiration.  The landscape is important to me as a theme – a place for inspiration.  Big Sur, California, is probably one of the most beautiful places on earth, and I’ve made a number of paintings inspired by trips there, including a painting titled, Pico Blanco, which is a mountain sacred to the indigenous people of that area.  I went on a hike there and I purposely studied and attempted to memorize the colors of the landscape for future use.  I made the painting about six months later, working from memory.

Vincent Van Gogh left Paris and moved to the south of France. He intended to use the quality of light there to invigorate his work with bright and exuberant colors, a world bathed in joyous light.  I have thought about his paintings often, and at the end of this last summer, I was painting out by the beach and there were some sunflowers in the house and it occurred to me to visit that theme – the sunflowers and the color yellow, both favorites of Van Gogh.  I had two canvases prepared at the time, and I went into the studio and chose every color that could be considered yellow.  This was the starting point for two paintings I titled, Sunflowers and Wit’s End.  In Sunflowers, I used only the yellow pigments I had selected, an all yellow painting in essence, but there is still quite a range, it’s not a monochrome painting at all.  In Wit’s End, I introduced small amounts of blue, red, violet and green in strategic places.  The painting has a real autumnal feel, and coincidentally, was painted on the first harvest moon.

I love the paintings of Valazquez, especially his mythology paintings, and mythology is also a special interest of mine.  Two paintings in particular, Apollo in Vulcan’s Forge and The Triumph of Bacchus, have intrigued me for years.  I made two paintings based on Vulcan’s Forge, Vulcan and Apollo.  Well, Vulcan, the blacksmith, he’s a craftsman isn’t he?  Apollo, the sun god, is also the god of logic and mathematics as well as the patron of all the arts, god of the muses. Bacchus, he wants to unravel all that logic and order and let things loose.  I was interested in capturing a glimmer of the palette Valazquez used, but I was also interested in channeling concepts of Apollo, Vulcan and Bacchus.

The paintings of mine I’ve just discussed have little or no resemblance to the source material. For me, the process of painting is almost alchemical, starting with specific materials and ending up with something entirely new.  I’ve been told many times that I have my own way of using color, and I believe that sets me apart from many other abstract painters.  I think it is my lack of prejudice against any color and my indifference towards what may or may not be considered tasteful.  I’m much more interested in how the colors feel and what kind of energy they contribute to the painting.

Ouillette, Vulcan, 2010, oil/canvas, 60"x120"

MMG:  How did you “invent” your style? How have you evolved as a painter?

JO: The brushstroke paintings came about as a solution to a problem. Throughout the development of my work, color has remained my main obsession.  In 2008, I set out to reinvent my paintings.  I wanted color to be the main focus, and I knew the work had to be abstract.  I knew I did not want to make hard-edged paintings and I did not want drawing to be an issue that distracted from the color.

Coincidentally, as I considered my next move, there was an exhibition at MoMA, which was extremely influential for me.  Anne Temkin curated, Color Chart:  Reinventing Color 1950 to Today.  The show examined color as a readymade material and its use as such in painting.  I enjoyed the show very much and thought: this is a conversation I could get into.  One problem: I was already making my own paint from scratch, not really a readymade material.

It suddenly occurred to me that the color needed a delivery system, the brushstroke, and that the brushes would be the readymade element of the painting.  The shape of each area of color would be dictated by the width of the brush used.  The brushstroke paintings were born at that moment.  I made the first brushstroke painting on Easter Sunday in 2008.  It was a coincidence to start a new series on that particular day so I titled the piece Easter Painting to mark the rebirth of myself as an artist and the reinvention of my art.

Ouillette, Bold as Love, 2011, oil/canvas, 96"x144"

MMG:  Have you faced an obstacle due to your style? If so, how did you overcome it?

JO: I don’t really spend a lot of time thinking about obstacles.  I just work from day-to-day, moment-to-moment, dealing with things as they happen.  If I have to go left, I go left, if I have to go right, I go right.  I see obstacles as an opportunity to approach something in a new way. Adapting to new and unexpected circumstances is an ideal way to work out the muscles of creativity and keep the inspirational juices flowing.

Ouillette, Parnassus, 2011, oil/canvas, 90" x 150"

MMG:  What does color mean to you?

JO: Color is amazing.  First of all, it is very specific – color can be measured scientifically.  On the other hand, it is completely subjective in the eye of the viewer.  Color means something because people choose to give it meaning and I find this very interesting.  Ad Reinhardt found the subjective interpretation of color troublesome, while I completely embrace it.  One thing that my paintings make plain is that color means something and that is a lot.

Ouillette, Triumph of Bacchus, 2011, oil/canvas, 45"x60"

MMG:  What is next? What would you like to accomplish in your next series?

JO: I don’t like to make too many statements about the future, especially my own future.  I really dislike fortune-tellers, not because I think they are fraudulent, but because I don’t see any value in knowing one’s own fate.  There is no adventure in a journey if you know how it ends. It is the not knowing that keeps me going.  When I first moved to New York, I was fortunate enough to meet Robert Rauschenberg.  He stressed how important it was to always surprise himself with his own work and I completely agree.

Fortune-tellers aside, I do have lots of ideas.  Of course, I don’t give ideas much weight until they are put into practice.  I will definitely be working with the brushstroke theme, which is open to an infinite world of color combinations.  I have been considering what greater role the grid can play in these paintings.  I also have a few ideas for some monochrome paintings and possibly some shaped canvases too. There has to be a real intention behind the motivation though, otherwise it is just a meaningless action.  I need to know why I am doing it, much more than what it will be.  Whatever I do, color will rule the day.

Ouillette, Orpheus, 2011, oil/canvas, 45"x60"

Email This Post Email This Post
Posted in Conversations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do You “include yourself in that us or not?”

AC Institute, 547 West 27th Street, Suite 610, New York, NY 10001; Tuesday through Saturday 1.00 until 6.00pm; Thursday 1.00 until 8.00pm

Four Exhibitions running from May 12th through June 18th, 2011

Joseph Farbrook (image courtesy of AC)

Michael Georgetti (image courtesy of AC)

AC is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization, which means that the director Holly Crawford hangs work that don’t necessarily have to sell. This is definitely not a bad thing. AC Institute fosters creative forces, upon which museums pounce after an artist has made it “big.” AC Institute website reads:

The AC Institute’s mission is to advance the understanding of the arts through investigation, research and education. It is a lab and forum for experimentation and critical discussion. We support and develop projects that explore a performative exchange across visual, sonic, verbal and experiential disciplines. We encourage critical writing that challenges conventional expectations of meaning and objectivity as well as the boundaries between the rational and subjective.

As an artist, scientist, socialist and more (with a Ph.D from the University of Essex in the History of art along with a B.A and M.A. in Economics and M.S. in Behavioral Science from UCLA), Crawford truly agitates artistic experimentation. Personally Crawford appears to shy from turgid prose. Her 2008 installation The Bone features “punctuation performance,” in which Crawford exhibits Clement Greenberg’s punctuations from his essay “Avant-garde and Kitsch,” eliminates Greenberg’s words and displays his “orotund” stigmeology.

Jonathon Keats (image courtesy of AC)

The KIT Collaboration + Robert Saucier (image courtesy of AC)

AC’s current show feature four separate exhibitions: Strata-Caster, Joseph Farbrook; THE DUTY FREE SHOP IS ON THE 3RD FLOOR AS YOU PASS THROUGH THE EYE OF THE NEEDLE, Michael Georgetti; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENTS, Jonathon Keats; Virutorium, The KIT Collaboration + Robert Saucier. Not to spoil the viewer’s fun, this author decides to not write a formal critique. Notably the exhibitions vary in medium, yet all offer a cogent illumination into a human’s reliance and reaction to societal axioms.

Email This Post Email This Post
Posted in Recommendations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Well Hung” Artists: Feature on Pablo Power

Pablo Power was born in a log cabin in rural Maryland but spent his formative years in the seamy, creative crucible of Miami of the 1980′s and 90′s. While bombing every city space, Power had assembled an impressive textual design portfolio without even realizing it. After years of documenting works on the streets, he widened his frame and captured more than the paintings on the façades. Now, Power immortalizes the whole building, the adjacent street, train tracks, and the bizarre characters that populate them. Once he incorporates these photographs with studio work, he experiments with texture and medium by applying pure pigment and found notes from the gutter to wood panels. Power embraces the culture that his works portray. He admits that his archive has been built by his enjoyable rambles in a side of the city, most don’t see.They Live On Within Us (full title above) displays years of artistic investigation that have coalesced effectively.

Email This Post Email This Post
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Well Hung” Artists: Feature on Jeff and Will Robbins

Jeff and Will Robbins, (Gold Metallic), 2011, 67" x 67" Blowtorch, plastic couch cover and gold leaf

It takes two Robbins, Jeff and Will, to consider stretching the plastic cover intended to protect a couch over stretcher bars, in turn creating a transparent rather than primed surface. The deconstruction of found objects and iconography often appears in the trajectory of Contemporary Art History, yet the Kitsch factor disappears beneath layers of hastily applied gold leaf that appear to be scraped away to expose the painting’s interior. (Gold Metallic) features a dichotomy of high art trimmings on rough and tough terrain. It appears that the Robbins have discovered a way to bear their artistic souls—literally—as the viewer can see through either side of the painting. Nevertheless, the Robbins’ technique cannot be coined as vacuous because although superficially their work is see-through, their thought is tightly wrapped and blowtorched. As a well-hung painting, The Robbins add another dimension to the traditional painting by problematizing the idea of surface. Unable to turn the piece,  the viewer is pleasurably tortured with the naughty idea of taking (Gold Metallic) of the wall and view it in the round.

Corrections: In initial article the artists names were misspelled and the medium was wrongly defined. These mistakes have been mended.

Email This Post Email This Post
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Veiling the American Female Artist

“The Deconstructive Impulse: Women Artist Reconfigure the Signs of Power, 1973-1991” (referred to as “Deconstructive Impulse” for the purpose of this review) is on view at Nueberger Museum of Art, Purchase College, State University of New York, from January 15th until April 3rd, 2011. The exhibition has been funded in part by the National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., and also by the Friends of the Neuberger Museum of Art. “Deconstructive Impulsive,” has been coined by Craig Owens in his 1983 essay “The Discourse of Others: Feminist and Postmodernism.” This information is printed in the book that accompanies the exhibition. One learns a great deal of interesting information from reading the Front Matter or Forward and Acknowledgments of books.

Unfortunately this writer has decided to not access the remarkable collection of works on display because she feels an obligation to comment on the curatorial intention of the exhibition, which the exhibition’s book outlines with a number of essays.

In general, “Deconstructive Impulse” addresses the issue of hegemony in the history of art and analyzes the paradoxical view of Postmodernist Art and Deconstructivism Feminist Art. The discourse of “Art” is comprised by a historical “movements.” These movements are associated with “isms” that attempt to convey a similar pattern of trends. Specifically, Deconstructivism has canonically been defined as a postmodern genre of art that has reappropriated mass media signifiers and common iconography to expose the fallacy of commodification’s foundation. During this period, many male artists have received acclaim and others even have become infamous, i.e., Andy Warhol, for reconstructing formal elements of aesthetics. The creators of “Deconstructive Impulse” sincerely wish to recognize female artists who have contributed to this period of art, yet their primary goal remains unaccomplished due to simple semantics.

Many of the essayists challenge the reader to reexamine the origin of popular-culture history and reevaluate Feminist contribution to the deconstruction of visual culture during the 1970’s through the 1990’s. Unfortunately grouping the artists as “Feminists” further isolates their work; this seems to nearly patronize the artists’ roles. What may have been a revolutionary exhibition two decades ago actually appears stale or outdated, reinforcing what it hopes to eliminate. “Deconstructive Impulse” limits history to a “linear trajectory,” highlights certain institutions and denies the value of creations from individual artist.

More than one author has used the word “hindsight” in order to reveal that past art historians have neglected to include the importance of female artists in a time concentrating on gender roles and sexuality in society. Sadly, this exhibition intends to captivate an audience of the 21st Century. Today “hindsight” is a term as vapid as “Kitsch” to the mid-twenties to thirty generation. The current generation has been ingrained with the idea to think ahead not behind. The off-putting introduction only acts as an impediment. As imperative as the featured works are to the history of Deconstructivism, the importance drowns in a sea of platitudes and citations of critics, such as Roland Barthes, whose theories have been debunked years ago.

Rather than stating that discrimination “continues to plague both fields [mass media and powerful institutions of high culture],” “Deconstructive Impulse” should celebrate female artists and further explore their advancement in art and society.

To be candid, the exhibition nearly correlates with the “Western” traditionalist view of the hijab in Contemporary Iranian art. To the unfamiliar eye, a hijab may seem as though it were an imprisonment forced on the person beyond or underneath the cloth; a tool utilized to oppress those who are ruled by the laws of a more powerful sex, the man. The veil empowers a woman to choose who notices her by directing her gaze, controlling her body language, and manipulating the style. Beyond noticeable traits, the idea of the veil bestows her with an almost autonomous attribute. Dividing the individual from the world, the curtain grants her the ability to employ privacy in her favor. To further explain, it appears that “Deconstructive Impulse” does not expose an alternate view point of the female artists on exhibition.

Even as a retrospective, “Deconstructive Impulse” sustains the archaic stereotype it challenges. Diaspora exists not between two locations but between two distinct ideologies: the repression of American female artists and the immense effect of their art. Perhaps it is time to finally unveil the American female artist and allow her to gain recognition purely through artistic ability rather than first pointing out her extra X chromosome.

Email This Post Email This Post
Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment